Thursday, June 12, 2025

• City Council Meeting June 2025

   TOP NEWS FROM THE MEETING


  • Wildomar City Hall Goes Back to Five Days a Week
  • Water Rates to Go Up By an Average of $15 Per Family of Four in July
  • 20 Acre Park Update
  • 2nd Motor Officer Added ($456K First Year Costs)

It was a great meeting. I encourage you to cue up the video (link will be at the bottom of the blog) and listen to it as it happened, but I'll give you a brief overview of the most noteworthy items in the half hour I have to put this blog together.

The biggest news of the night was delivered at the end, and was a surprise to at least two of the council members: City Hall will go back to five days a week from 7:30am to 6pm. 

That was something the council has been working towards since I got onto council in 2018. There were several things that kept it from happening over the years, but the final impediment was removed in April, and in less than two months, the will of the people was finally heeded. 

Thank you to Mayor Ashlee DePhillippo for being the final push getting this nailed down... kudos to you!

Water Rates Going Up

We knew this was coming. The State has a pie-in-the-sky approach to governing as they're trying to legislate perfection. 
tHaNk yOu, sAcRamENto, yoU'rE alWaYs lOokINg oUt foR Us. 

They are trying to regulate something known as PFAS in drinking water, which, if we're honest about it, is a veritable impossibility to illiminate no matter how desperately would like to. 

But what isn't impossible is to create regulations that make the precious resource more difficult for average people to afford. 


New Park Update

For those who don't know, the city bought about twenty acres of land from the lovely ladies who run Anne Sullivan Preschool about two years ago. It's directly to the east of the school, and continues southward down Palomar a bit.

They've been using it as a natural park to walk through, and they wanted the city to take it over and continue the "natural park" feel, instead of the other option: selling to a developer and building more houses.

There will be parking off Palomar, and the projected opening is less than a year away. There are no specifics this far out, but the city is contractually obligated to have it opened to the public by June of 2026. 

It'll look mostly like it does today. If there are ever further upgrades, that's years into the future, and many millions of dollars away.

Before it opens, we'll be giving it a proper name... be part of the process. 

2nd Motor Officer Approved
I was on record saying that I'd rather have more patrol time, or even more code enforcement, than a second motor officer at the cost of half a million dollars per year. We can't have everything.

Contrary to the well-meaning but misguided views of my learned council colleague Carlos Marquez, we will always be a small market team. 

I never said we were a minor league [team], but a small market [team]. 

Let's jump headlong into the baseball analogy... in this case, we're the 
Kansas City Royals. 

Kansas City isn't a minor league team like Lake Elsinore Storm, it simply doesn't have the capacity to compete with New York or Los Angeles, just as Wildomar doesn't have the capacity to compete with Temecula or Riverside. 

Their budgets dwarf ours, just as the Dodgers' ability to endlessly shell out greenbacks reminds the Royals who they are.

Sure, some people love sloganeering; it feels good, but I've never been much of a rah-rah guy boosting unrealistic things.
Let's not lose sight of who we are.
Plenty of small-market teams have won the World Series, and Wildomar can achieve excellence while not forgetting who we are. 
•                •                •

Last, but not least, (actually, this happened at the beginning of the meeting), Wildomar honored its first Employee of the Year, Dustin Wyatt.
Homegrown Dustin Wyatt of the public works team gets Wildomar's first employee of the year award. Back row is Councilmembers Dustin Nigg, Carlos Marquez, Bridgette Moore and Joseph Morabito. Mayor Ashlee is standing to Dustin Wyatt's right in the front of the dais.

Tuesday, June 3, 2025

• Planning Commission Meeting Preview June 2025

It's been a while since I've seen a sizeable Planning Commission agenda, and the June meeting is set to have at least three major items.

Right out of the gate is Cherry Outpost (Retail Center).

2.1 Cherry Outpost Retail Center Project

Since this is an active development that may come before the city council someday, I have to be doubly cognizant to remain unbiased. I'm just here to share information I got from the agenda.

1) a 4-story, 72-room hotel (45,571 square feet)

2) a gas station complex, including a 4,176-square-foot convenience store with an attached 3,200-square-foot drive-through restaurant, and a 2-position RV fueling area 

3) a stand-alone 4,425-square-foot fast food/drive-through restaurant

4) a 5,724-square-foot express car wash with related accessories.

From the agenda

"The Applicant (Jack Kofdarali) has secured one (1) lease for Tommy’s Car Wash. The other uses are unidentified at this time."

Psst... FYI, last I heard,Tommy's brand is owned by the applicant.

Project Location/Vicinity: The project site encompasses approximately 6.65+ acres and is located at the NWC of Cherry St. & Bundy Canyon Road. 


The project site is comprised of two (2) legal parcels zoned C-H (Commercial Highway) and is currently vacant. There are single family uses both north and east of the site. 


Cherry Outpost Sign Program Analysis: The applicant has submitted a master sign program for the proposed retail center for Planning Commission Consideration. 

The sign program meets all code requirements in Chapter 17.180 (Signs) of the WMC. The sign program is provided for Commission consideration in Attachment F. 

You guessed it, the carwash is the only future business that is signed to go in, and the same owner already has one approved and underway on Clinton Keith/Stable Lanes (west side of freeway, between the Starbucks and Stadium Pizza). Not to mention one across from the new Kaiser on Wildomar Trail.

Staff’s recommendation for approval of the sign program is included in PC Resolution No. 2025-10 (Attachment C).

Something to keep in mind

The Planning Commission decision is final, so the CUP would not go to Council if approved by the Planning Commission, unless the decision is appealed.

Without the CUP, the car wash cannot go there.


This is a very weighty agenda item with over 20 attachments. Use the following link to access the agenda item.

LINK

Each of these is several pages, if not dozens of pages.


2.2 Development Code Amendment No. 2025-01 (Cannabis Code Amendment)

The city council made a few minor modifications to the existing code earlier in the year. The above graphic gives a summary.

3.3 Request for Direction on the Placement of Metal Shipping Containers as Accessory Structures on Lots or Parcels Not Less Than 1/2 Acre in Size Within the Agricultural and Rural Residential Zones

PROJECT ANALYSIS: 

Existing Standards: Metal shipping containers are only permitted on properties of at least 5 acres in certain zones. Containers must comply with setback, height, and aesthetic standards. Conditional use permits (CUPs) may be required in some cases to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. 


Public Comments and Potential Changes: 

  • Allowing metal shipping containers on smaller parcels within agricultural and rural residential zones, subject to development standards. 
  • Implementing conditional use permit (CUP) requirements for containers exceeding a specified size or number. 
  • Requiring aesthetic enhancements (e.g., painting, screening) to minimize visual impacts. 

Pros: 

  • Provides property owners with additional storage options. 
  • Supports agricultural uses with secure, weather-resistant storage. 
  • May reduce unauthorized placement of containers. 

Cons: 

  • Potential for negative visual impact on residential areas. 
  • Risk of noncompliance or unauthorized container use. 
  • Possible conflict with residential neighborhood character in rural zones.

Wildomar Rap opinion time


I live in Windsong Valley, and containers wouldn't go here since our lots are very small in the first place. However, I'm a big proponent of property rights, and if a container was going to be coming into a smaller lot size (half acre minimum), and done in a way that respects the neighbors (interpreting that is where the wheels are most likely to go off the rails), it would be fine by me.

What say you when it comes to shipping containers being used in residential areas? Should the existing codes be changed or remain the same?