Assemblywoman Melissa Melendez, 67th Assembly District, had her first community coffee of 2017
She packed the house at RJ's in Murrieta and proceeded to go down the legislative update list she'd provided to the people in attendance.
|
A look at about 30% of the people in attendance. |
For those of you that haven't been to one of her community coffees, she doesn't give a speech. She reads most of the items on her legislative update, then takes questions on any topic. They typically last about an hour.
One of my favorite quotes of her's was, "Luckily right now it's early in the year so they haven't done a lot of damage yet," which was met with amused laughter from the group, and she followed up with, "give us time."
Her two sided handout was broken up by things you'll love and things you'll hate.
She started with the things you'll love side first.
AB 27 - Rape as a Violent Felony
This bill will make all forms of rape a violent felony.
It's stunning to think that RAPE, of any kind, can be off the Violent Felony list.
However, even though rape nearly always means FORCED SEX ON A PERSON WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT, somehow there are actually some types of rapes that don't qualify as violent.
Directly following this morning's community coffee, the assemblywoman was interviewed on KFI and this was touched on while she was on the air with Gary Hoffman and Shannon Farren. Apparently if a rape victim is passed out (from either drugs or alcohol) it's not classified as violent.
Here is a brief list of "non violent" rape:
• statutory rape
• rape of an unconscious person
• rape of an intoxicated person
• rape using a controlled substance.
The only one I'd be willing to hear a counterargument to is statutory rape. Some of those are boyfriend/girlfriend with a nominal age gap this side or that side of 18, aside from those... rape is rape.
When asked, "Who would be against such a bill that would make all rape a violent felony?" The answer was, "The ACLU."
Figures.
Upholding the Second Amendment
The stunner here (or not so much, considering the braindead one party rule up in Sacramento) is that Melendez was taken off the Public Safety Committee, though she's been the Vice Chair for the four years she's been our Assemblywoman.
That's the committee that hears all the gun bills, all the law and order bills, all the crime and punishment bills.
It's her reward for doing too effective of a job up there.
It was basically a political vendetta on the part of the Speaker of the Assembly because MM was too effective at countering Sacramento's bull crap. They wanted someone less effective to get the position.
Utilizing Existing Funds for Road Repair
They've tried in the past to get this commonsense legislation passed, but to no avail so far.
The aim is to pass legislation that says: Sacramento has to use the money collected for transportation, FOR TRANSPORTATION.
Sadly, this kind of commonsense is eschewed by California's Democrat majority.
Legislative Whistleblower Protection Act
This will be the third attempt on the part of Assemblywoman Melendez to get this through. As it stands, the laws that protect whistleblowers does NOT apply to the staff of legislators.
My bet is that it will go down to defeat just as it has before. Nothing quite as nauseating as the unctuous stench that comes from legislators exempting themselves from the laws that apply to the rest of us.
Franchise Tax Credit
This is aimed at assisting businesses that would like to relocate to California, giving them a five year exemption on the Franchise Tax Fee.
This was beyond my understanding, but if it concerns you, contact the Assemblywoman's office. They'll give you the pertinent details.
Sober Living Homes Bill
This isn't about stopping such group homes. We want people to straighten out their lives [from substance abuse] and sober up. Many need the help of such facilities. The problem is that if a group home is comprised of six or fewer "guests" there is no regulation.
As it stands today, anyone can open up a "sober living home" and not need any training or other qualifications.
Sorry, but if we're going to regulate lemonade stands and what can and can't be sold at the park snack bar during a city sponsored event, I want group homes in my neighborhood to be regulated too.
|
A look at the crowd from the other side of the room. |
Next, the bad legislation on the 2017 horizon:
aka Things we'll hate.
AB 1 (Frazier) & SB 1 (Beall)
This bill, among other things, would increase the gas tax by at least 12¢ per gallon and the diesel tax by at least 20¢ per gallon.
Of course, if the majority party, that has been ruling the capital for generations, would just use the money already raised for road repairs, such tax increases wouldn't be needed for road repair.
AB 5 (Gonzales-Fletcher)
This is one of those government overreach bills that wants to dictate to businesses more rules about new hires. It apparently aims to require businesses to offer more hours to existing employees before hiring additional employees.
Here's the problem. Some people still think we live in America, and want LESS regulation, especially on this level, not MORE of it.
This was discussed for awhile.
It's surmised that the authors of this bill are looking for a way to "encourage" (cough... more like "force") businesses into having more full time workers.
A noble idea, but one so shortsighted that it would only find favor in California's heavily biased seat of power.
In a sane world, where many onerous obligations don't start to kick in after about 30 hours, bosses and managers would far prefer having full time employees.
However, when you start dictating to businesses what types of benefits you must offer your full time employees, anyone with a brain would have been able to see the spike in part timers, as they began taking over the full timers.
Repeat after me the well known aphorism: the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
AB18 (Pan)
According to the handout, "This bill undermines the role of the parent by establishing seven, incredibly vague "rights" for youth in California in order to determine the best interest of the children."
|
If you can't read the graphic, follow the link at the bottom of the blog. |
As Melendez was reading the proposed "rights" from the website, I kept waiting for something along the lines of, "...and a flying unicorn for every child," to be one of the proposed new "rights."
Must we revisit the aphorism mentioned above so soon? Good intentions or not, some things are nothing but poppycock on steroids. This being one of them.
As the hour was winding down, there was one guy that was having a problem. It appeared that he'd been in contact with the assemblywoman's office many times before, as she remembered the man and his story, and it sounded as if he already has a private appointment with her.
As compelling as his story may have been, something about his friend racking up $74,000 in legal fees trying to defend a lawsuit over a "fraudulent" $120 invoice, time and place, sir.
This was neither the time nor the place for personal problems. At one point a couple of CHP officers approached him to maintain order. I think without their intervention the guy would have continued to escalate.
Based on the fees he claims were paid to defend a bogus case should remind everyone why so many people just settle cases. You can "WIN" the lawsuit, and still end up on the short end of things.
I spoke to Melendez's representative, Branden Webb, and asked when we can get one of these community coffees in Wildomar. I has happy to hear his response that they're working on it and we should expect one in Spring.
I urge all Wildomartinis to make time on your schedule to attend if at all possible. The way to know when such community coffees are happening is to sign up for the Assemblywoman's emails.
• • •
Hell isn't merely paved with good intentions; it's walled and roofed with them. Yes, and furnished too.
– Aldous Huxley
Wildomar Rap reminds you that whenever you find yourself meandering down the primrose path, there's no better mode of travel than a hand basket.