Wednesday, August 19, 2026

• City Council Meeting August Special Meeting

Very brief meeting followed by a workshop that lasted about an hour. 

The meeting had one item of  "special business," which was to decide whether to hold city council elections in districts 1 and 3 with just one name on the ballot. If you blinked two weeks ago you missed the close of the nomination period for a name to be put on the ballot.

This is an election year where the terms of three city council seats were concluding. That's districts 1, 3, and 5.

There was only one non-incumbent, Pedro Magdaleno, who went to the trouble of meeting with the city clerk (takes about an hour), getting the necessary signatures (twenty), and turning them in before the deadline (literally done in the last hours of the final day)... but has never been to a city council meeting to weigh in on any topic —ever. 

Not even to introduce himself as someone looking to represent the city. 

I'd like to know why he thinks he's a better option than incumbent Ashlee DePhillippo, who has done an outstanding job representing the residents of our town. 

Oh, he didn't submit any contact information or even a ballot statement along with the nomination papers. Call me jaded if you want, but how can I be expected to take this as a serious candidacy? 

One more factoid of interest with the challenger for District 5, his wife works for the city... can you say "awkward!"
No photos of challenger Pedro Magdaleno were submitted to the city or found after an internet search. 
The estimated cost for placing the uncontested city council races on the ballot was said to be $30,000. 

One reason for having an uncontested seat on the ballot is to make room for a write-in candidate. 

I asked if voting for Mickey Mouse would be counted (*historically, Mickey gets votes in nearly every election throughout the country), and the answer is that such votes may be kept unofficially, but they don't show up in the official box score.

For example, in the 2024 County Supervisor race, there was a write-in candidate. He got 9 votes out of 102,279 cast. With these facts in mind, I made a motion to adopt option 1: appointing nominees for districts 1 and 3 in lieu of an election on November 3rd.


Long-Range Service Plan Community Workshop

In lieu of a recap, I'll summarize the four minute comment by the city manager that touched on the point of this endeavor. I'll leave a cued up link to his comments if you'd like to hear them as they were uttered (I'd suggest doing so)

A slide from the presentation. Use the link to access the full 13 slide presentation.

Wildomar City Manager Chris Mann said the quiet part out loud at last night's meeting. The city is basically 18 years old now, and in his words, it's "coming into adulthood."

That's not just a nice line. He walked everyone back through the rough early years after incorporation. The state yanked Vehicle License Fee funding. Parks got fenced off after a ballot measure failed. Public safety staffing was thin, to put it kindly.

Fast forward to today and things look different. Voters passed Measure Z to get the parks reopened. Measure AA added a one percent sales tax. The economy grew. Property tax revenue eventually replaced what the state took away.

Add it all up and the city has a structurally balanced budget. Mann says it can probably stay that way, as long as everyone stays careful with it.

But here's the catch. Balanced budget doesn't mean Wildomar has caught up to its neighbors.

The city just doesn't have the land to build the kind of big shopping centers, logistics hubs, or auto malls that pump serious tax revenue into cities like Murrieta or Temecula. Economic development still matters, Mann said, but it's not going to close that gap on its own.

On top of that, Wildomar inherited a rough road system from the county. A lot of it was never even paved. And there are still big open questions hanging out there. A community center. A senior center. Equestrian space, ball fields, a skate park, maybe aquatics. Plus long term staffing for deputies and fire stations.

So what's the move? 

Mann put it back on the community. Wildomar can keep taxes low and settle for more modest amenities. That's a real option, and a fair one.

Or it can chase the kind of services and amenities Murrieta and Temecula offer. But that path isn't free. It means new revenue has to come from somewhere.

What the city can't do, according to Mann, is keep drifting without a plan. Build one thing, expand another, and wake up one day having missed the stuff that actually mattered most.

That's the point of the process happening right now. Get everyone rowing toward the same roadmap, so decisions get made on purpose instead of by accident.

Wildomar Rap opinion time


I've always been a realist, but the condition has become more pronounced as the decades have rolled by. 

I can appreciate the efforts of the staff to put together such a presentation, even if the staff in this case are an outside agency contracted for "not to exceed $55K," but not really see the ROI (Return On Investement). 

I've seen very many similar workshops (a parks masterplan of 2014 comes to mind, where, in reality, the only differences today are things that did NOT come from that past effort). 

There was another parks visioning workshop about five years later... 

We voted to save $30,000 tonight by removing uncontested city council seats from the ballot, if it had been up to me, this event would have never made it out of the talking stage. 

Minimally, I would have wanted to push this as far as possible before seeking outside help. I get it, I'm the one who taught Thomas how to doubt, but I've yet to see the Warner Bros. frog sing, for all the promises made before the show started. 
Michigan J Frog, at your service
Instead of belaboring this, I support the effort since the city is spending money on it, but understand that once the hoopla is over and done, it'll get filed away into the memory hole of yesteryear and never get brought up again. 

Remember, there's an even more expensive study (a specific plan for a new historic downtown). If you missed my rants about it, and haven't already had your fill of my brand of reality, here's a link to what the city is budgeting more than $450,000 for that beauty. 

Bottom line
We are fiscally hemmed in with very little wiggle room for any additions to anything in Wildomar. That's simply a fact that can't be papered over or workshopped around.

In the City Manager's opening remarks, he said in less direct wording, we can have anything if you're ready to pay higher taxes to get it. 

The question you have to ask yourself is if you think 67% of the voters in Wildomar are ready to take on a higher tax liability to get things like a community center, develop the parkland we've had on the books for years, and many other basic things most other cities have... my read of the community is that there isn't a groundswell to take on significant debt to pay for such amenities. 

If you have opinions about it, let's hear what they are!


A word on Mickey Mouse as a write-in candidate since WWII

I asked AI Claude to weigh in... Mickey Mouse really is the reigning champ of unqualified write-in votes. He shows up in basically every county's discard pile, election after election, decade after decade. One political scientist quoted in a piece about it put it well: Mickey Mouse is often called the most reliable "guest star" among fake write-in candidates, showing up on discard piles alongside Donald Duck and "None of the Above." The American Prospect

A few data points on scale:

  • In Orange County, Florida alone in 2016, Mickey Mouse pulled in 1,103 write-in votes across races including president, senator, congress, state attorney, tax collector, and property appraiser. Spectrum News
  • In 2020, Orange County voters wrote him in 391 times for property appraiser and another 555 times for sheriff alone. Spectrum News
  • Election workers seem to expect it at this point. A Georgia election official said flatly that if Mickey doesn't get votes in an election, it's a bad election. The American Prospect

So the honest answer to "is it Mickey Mouse" is: yes, by reputation and by the sheer number of elections and jurisdictions he shows up in. But here's the important caveat — there's no single national tally of unqualified write-ins. Every state, and often every county, handles this differently. Some (like Maryland) don't track them at all unless the "candidate" has formally filed. Florida counties, by contrast, have released detailed spreadsheets in response to records requests, which is where most of these Mickey Mouse numbers come from.

So Mickey doesn't have one all-time record number, he's more like the most consistently popular fake write-in across time and geography, which is probably the more interesting story for your purposes anyway. Runners-up worth a mention if you want to have fun with it: Donald Duck is a perennial close second, Jesus Christ shows up constantly, and depending on the election cycle you'll see everyone from Harambe the gorilla to the Flying Spaghetti Monster to "U R Mom." The American Prospect


Thursday, August 13, 2026

• City Council Meeting August 2026

Two big items were pulled from the agenda (*2.3 and 3.2) and are said to be slated for next month's agenda. That, in my estimation, reduced the number of newsworthy items to one, 3.1 (see below). 

The meeting started with a presentation to two local Eagle Scouts, Canyon Dannenberger and AJ Acosta of Troop 332.

  

A twist with one of the Public Comments on non-agenda items in that a proclamation was given to the Council (it's usually the other way around)

It was recognizing the 250th year of the United States of America from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, and for the service the council does for the community. 

The presenters were Malia Olsingh and Susan Lovett. Also in the photo are Malia's mother, Carrie, and little brother (I didn't get his name). 

Before getting to the key news story, let me add highlights from the Community Development Department update first.

Several projects that are in the process of being built were mentioned. 

Wildomar Crossroads (Sprouts)
The construction of the apartments has begun, but there is a delay with the commercial side of the project. 
Marriot (Townplace Suites, 102 Rooms)
This is immediately to the west of the new Kaiser medical office building. They are still in the grading part of construction and no dates were given as to when it would open, or even when we will see "vertical" construction. 
Stable Lanes (Carwash on Clinton Keith)
This is located between Barons and Starbucks. It's about 13,000sf of commercial that, at one time, was said to be the future home of an auto parts store and A Better Buzz coffee dispensary.
I asked staff if they knew which tenants were going in alongside the carwash, and there wasn't a definitive answer, but there was a drive-thru pad mentioned.

Camelia Townhomes (Palomar and Washington)
This development caused a lot of commotion back in 2017, but that was before all the low-income apartments that Sacramento started forcing into every community up and down the state. Now I'm sure people are happy to see market-rate, for-sale condos (about 163 units in a gated community). 
Reminder, these are FOR SALE units, with a price point of half a million dollars. 

The original price points, if memory serves well, were around $200K, but I asked last night, and the number being batted around at this point is closer to half a mil. 

There is serious road realignment going on there. Historically, Palomar curved into Washington around the city line with Murrieta, but that's changing.

Palomar will now be going straight into Jefferson with Washington being a T intersection. Before there is a certificate of occupancy, all the roadwork will need to be buttoned up. No timetable for that at this point. 


Tres Lagos (Phase 3)
They've done work on their drainage mitigation measures, but they don't have any other permits pending at this time.

Walmart

Building permits have not been issued. There wasn't a guesstimate of when they'd be open, but based on past statements, we can anticipate before Christmas 2027. 

Unnamed 20 Acre Park
Brief background.

In 2023 I helped spearhead the acquisition (without using general fund dollars) of twenty acres adjacent to the Windsong Valley community. The other option was for the previous owners to sell it to a developer who could have built about 80 homes (that's not taking into account "density bonuses" the state encourages). 
The twenty acres are already a quasi natural park with a loop trail, and converting it to public use would be a relatively easy lift compared to other undeveloped parkland in Wildomar. 

In short, the dollar amount necessary to open this park is far smaller than to open the 27 acre park next to Ronald Reagan Elementary School or the 11 acre park next to David A Brown Middle School. 

Ok, with that established, we've been eagerly awaiting this park's opening for well over a year, and the date keeps getting pushed back.

I don't know who to throw under the bus, so I'll lay it at the feet of the previous Wildomar city manager. A lot was going on in 2025, and dealing with the opening of this park in the promised amount of time, obviously slid off the important things to attend to list. 

I will slot myself as the key proponent of this park, even, dare I say, ahead of Bridgette Moore (who loves parks more than Spiderman loves shooting webs and traveling from building to building down city blocks. lol), but in this case, I asked my council colleagues to NOT go ahead with a temporary entrance off Gierson Ave. 

Let me back up again

The original plan was to put the entrance off of Palomar, with a secondary entrance off of an extended Gierson. That's the part that fell by the wayside. 
This is the location of the entrance and parking lot off of Palomar St.
There was an artificial urgency to get the park opened, though there weren't any contractual obligations to do so, as most of us shared the same misapprehension that there were. 

Once it was clearly established that we don't need to do a rush job trying to open this new park before it's ready, we stopped rushing.

The denouement (yes, I love 10¢ words 😁), the city will not be opening the new natural park with a temporary entrance on Gierson Ave. 
This is the dead end street of Gierson Avenue. When it's time to create this entrance to the park, it needs to be done according to the approved plans, not any temporary measures.
The original plan of the primary entrance off Palomar is back in place. There was no estimated opening date, but based on previous estimates to open that entrance, it could be September 2027, but let's wait for the official words from the Public Works department. 

Remember, when money becomes available, there are plans for a full extension of Gierson and a proper parking lot and entry point. 
When this happens, I hope that whoever is on Wildomar's city council will demand that the entrance to the newly extended Gierson be where the gate to close the park is set, and not allow for the new cul-de-sac to be an after hours hang out. 
Also in the mix was an alternate entrance off of South Pasadena St, which looks like a good spot for on street parking and another way into the park. 
Thank you to staff for coming up with this suggestion. Now, let's work to make it happen.
--------------

There are two ways to watch this city council meeting. One is on YouTube, the other is through the city's website. Both have their own advantages. The YouTube option comes with its standard player and the ability to jump throughout the video. 


The option on the city's website lets you go into the agenda and click the exact item you're looking for (no guesswork involved). 




*2.3

Thursday, July 9, 2026

• City Council Meeting July 2026

We began with a proclamation by the Daughters of the Revolution: America 250

Daughters of the American Revolution

Meeting Recap

Before getting into the agenda as presented, let me touch on several public comments that we received. 

Darla Dunn, the driving force behind Wild-O-Market Space. She would like to see more backing by the city.

Wildomar Rap opinion time


I've lived in Wildomar for twenty-five years and I can't remember how many times I've heard people opine for an open air market like this in town (it's a lot).

Wild-O-Market 
Space still trying to find its bearings, it's got a lot of room to grow, but it won't be able to develop into an institution if it doesn't get supported by either the city apparatus or the city residents. 

Below is Darla's public comment.

In addition to that, there was a theme among several public speakers, indicating to me that many haven't been keeping up with new state housing laws over the past ten or so years.

I don't blame them. Most people have better things to do than chase down all the lesser publicized laws that Sacramento has enacted, but they still exist, they apply to Wildomar, and many of them defy logic. 

Proposed Melia Homes, Wildomar (95 units).

There are two developments that are wending their way through the planning department. Melia Homes on Wesley and Palomar (95 market rate homes and 4 low income homes), and "Mission Hills" with a total of 51 units on 12 acres. 

I can't imagine actually calling that area "Mission Hills." It's right up there for worst name of an area since "The Miracle Mile" that was foisted on the Clinton Keith Business corridor in the past. Thankfully, that nonsense is in the past. 

Several well-meaning residents essentially implored the council to "Keep Wildomar Wild." 

To a member, your Wildomar City Council wholeheartedly agrees

We've been the ones leading the charge to fight back against the state. I'm sorry if you've been looking in a different direction, but that's the fact. We're already on your side.

Respectfully, where have you been before now?

The problem is the state laws that go over our heads by a mile. 

There simply are no options to derail such developments.

Elections have consequences, and when you vote for the same party in Sacramento, over and over and over again, they really become deaf to the concerns of places like Wildomar, as they continue to strip away at "local control".

Also, let me say, these are FOR SALE developments. Have you seen the price points of new homes in Wildomar? 

These are NOT "Section 8" by any stretch of the imagination... they just aren't

These developers are in it for profit (who isn't in business for "profit"?), and one person worried that they could change all the proposed units to "low income". 

There is less money, less profit, in low income units. People are still going to have to qualify for a mortgage, and I'd be stunned if there are any units under half a million dollars based on the current market.

Below is a parody video I made of this exact location well more than ten years ago. Remember folks, this isn't open space, it's not a park, it's someone's unfenced land that has a long history of being a dumping ground. 

Back to the agenda

There were several nuggets in the Public Works presentation to share. 

Wildomar Trail restriping near the freeway

To be on the safe side, I'm going to say it's supposed to be upgraded, including opening the u-turn at Margaret Lane, before the end of Summer. It could be done before the middle of August, but I'm tired of giving out dates that don't materialize.

It'll be done around the same time that Bundy Canyon, under the overpass, is completed.

City Maintained Roads v Non Maintained Roads

A key part of the presentation was going over the differences between dedicated city roads, and private roads. 

If this is an issue that you're curious about, please watch the video of the presentation. It explains the differences between the road designations.



Wildomar doesn't use money from property taxes to do road work.

As you can see from the estimated costs to bring all of Wildomar's roadways to top level would cost generations worth of road budget money. 

My comment was, this is part of keeping Wildomar "wild," dirt roads, and other 'careworn' roads that are never going to come close to matching areas like Temecula or Murrieta. 

This recent acquisition has started making recurring potholes a thing of the past. Long may it live. 


Shopping Cart Ordinance

A smattering of people have always pushed carts away from stores, into neighborhoods, but this ordinance is coming about as natural fallout from Tres Lagos. 

For those of us who live near the epicenter, we see carts abandoned there more times than we don't. 

Unfortunately, the owners of the carts in question haven't been cooperative with the carrot approach, so now it's time for the stick. 

The goal is for the owners of the shopping carts to find a way to keep them on their property, or at very minimum, cooperate in retrieving them when one of their customers dumps them in the right of way.

Discussion Regarding Recreation Programming Opportunities and Potential Future Recreation Service Models


The council was unanimous in wanting to explore this further. We'll never have a robust parks department like other cities, but that doesn't mean we should stay satisfied with the same meager level of amenities as Wildomar had decades before the glory of cityhood commenced. 

As more information comes out, I'll be sure to get it out to the public.


Future agenda item: Data Center Discussion

Councilwoman DePhillippo and I both had the same future agenda item to suggest. 

We don't envision Wildomar being sought after by such types, but under our current codes they're already not an allowed usage, and our maximum warehouse size is said to be 50,000sf. 

Still, we know this is an issue that the community has been following as its gone around the country, so we asked to bring the topic to the city council so that the residents can't weigh in on it... even though there is no desire to bring them here as it is.  

Though it wasn't formally announced, a townhall Townhall in September at Wildomar Elementary was casually mentioned by Councilwoman Bridgette Moore during one of her comments.

I'm sure they'll start getting out information as the date gets closer.

Just as the meeting was minutes from concluding the HVAC system decided to take a leak on the City Manager and City Attorney. After a ten minute break, we were able to conclude the meeting. 

Drip, drip, drip goes the water. 

Here is a link to the youtube video of the meeting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yt1i04Nrn0&t

Thursday, June 18, 2026

• Wildomar Who?

It's a running joke among the city council members, one that I suppose has gone back 18 years worth of cityhood, that we are ALWAYS overlooked when we get together regionally. 

Today I attended the Southwest Regional Economic Forecast and though we did have a speaking role as the other cities in the area did, I couldn't help but get a laugh out of the slide with the map of the area. 

Lakeland Village, Romoland, Homeland, Winchester, and Rainbow made the cut, but Wildomar, one of the five participating cities, didn't.
But we're used to it. To quote Elwood Blues when asked by his brother, Jake, how often the train goes by his apartment, "So often that you won't even notice it," and that's basically the case for Wildomar when we're playing in the subregional sandbox of SWRivCo.
Reminds me of the time, while I was Mayor in 2023, at a Murrieta/Wildomar Chamber of Commerce event to welcome new members, when a new Wildomar business in the Stater Bros shopping center called itself North Murrieta.

I welcomed them and introduced myself as the Mayor of North Murrieta. Bridgette Moore was there and her mouth nearly dropped to the floor. 🤣🤣🤣

Wildomar's Economic Development Manager, Ryan Miller, did a great job in his five minutes, highlighting various projects that are in the works. Finishing with the recently passed study for a historic downtown specific plan.
Ryan's been on the job in Wildomar for about 2 months now.

A shout out to Menifee Economic Development Director Kayla Charters, she's a product of Wildomar, and I believe that her parents still live in town.
Kayla Charters shares what's happening in Menifee.

To sum up the vibes from the event, depending on your POV on growth, it is very positive as there are a lot of things going on in our region and a lot to track as it comes online. 

Speaking of track

I remember hearing several years ago about a Formula 2 track heading to Lake Elsinore, and today it was touted in their presentation. I didn't hear any dates for when it's expected to open. 



Thursday, June 11, 2026

• City Council Meeting June 2026

A lot of action from the June 2026 meeting, but at the top of it all was a public comment from young Olivia Gregory, who shared her school project, which included her goal of becoming a paleontologist when she grows up. 

Seven year old Olivia Gregory addresses the council. 

Meeting Recap

I'm just going to highlight three items though there were many important items on the agenda.

Brown Act Update, and how it affects you. 

In short, you will now be able to give public comments from your own home (or wherever you happen to be). The city will undertake a public outreach to get the word out. 

Link to three page staff report

20 Acre Park Update

If you aren't sure, the city purchased property from the fine ladies at the Anne Sullivan Preschool. The intent was to open the 20 acres as a natural/passive park, it's a beautiful place.

This happened in 2023 and though I'm glad the land was secured away from developers, I'm discouraged that this park is already a year late in opening and it'll still be another year, at least. 

The city has contractual obligations to open the park to the public. Originally, that was in 2025, and now it's looking more like 2027 (fingers crossed).

The item in question was just to extend parts of the contract, but I anticipate the item coming back to city council next month so we can speak more about it.

Link to three page staff report, which includes a link to the 13 slide presentation

That's Allotta Notta For Nearly Half A Mil or Yay For The Historic Downtown Study

Is that a prejudiced headline? Of course it is. I was the lone dissenting vote when it came to approving a $459,225 study that I believe is a complete waste of money.

As I stated during the council discussion, it's very likely that even with this "specific plan" the corner across from Montague Brothers Coffee will still be vacant after your kindergartner graduates high school.

No developer has shown serious interest to date.

Here were my points

  1.  I like the concept.
  2.  It's way too much money.
  3.  Where are the landowners of the most impacted areas? Are they here tonight? If not, why not? What type of outreach to them was done? Did they respond? If they didn't respond, how many times was contact attempted before we gave up? Did we post the notice on their properties? Did we post the item anywhere near the general area, like other items coming to a city meeting? 
  4. There's currently a specific plan being developed for The Bluffs. My understanding is that it's being pushed by the landowners, and isn't being paid for by the city. I approve that model when it comes to specific plans. They pay, we don't.
  —Joseph Morabito, June 10, 2026

I'm glad that it took us over 40 minutes before the vote to approve happened, but I just can't understand the mindset that approves this amount of money for something that doesn't even have a 50-50 chance of coming to fruition.

This is how clear the map was in the proposal from the winning bidder (Albert A. Webb & Associates (WEBB)), but it'll give you an idea of where the "downtown overlay" is.

Let's break down my points.

1) I like the concept of having a specific plan for that area, but that should have been an overlay in the recently adopted General Plan update. Which cost the city $1.5M. 

That was for the entire city, this is going to cost 1/3 of that price and for what boils down to a few open fields. It was touted that back in 2013 there was a "Visioning Project" that discussed this very concept.

Pointing to the fact that there is nothing built there... if the 2013 city council had found hundreds of thousands of dollars to develop a "specific plan" then it would have been a waste of effort if, at the end of it, they were hoping for a development there.

It was later offered that the 2013 "Visioning Project" gave design guidelines to the area, which brought in the new faux split rail fencing at the post office area. 

I didn't want to be argumentative with staff. I like the people who make up our staff, but I restrained myself from replying, "We know that the struggling city of Wildomar 2013 wouldn't have spent any real amounts of city money on such a thing, and even if they had spent a comparable amount as the $450k, no one would hang a star on the design guidelines over an actual regional destination retail area."

2) It's a ridiculously large amount of money.

3) This was the biggest rub for me. If you watch the video, I get pretty animated about how the city didn't reach out to any of the landowners in question to get their views. 

"If you're planning on 'community engagement' on my property without telling me ahead of time, you're going to have a problem."

How is that not universally understood and a dealbreaker (or at least a deal postponer) for everyone? 

4) At the south end of town, there is about 160 acres of prime freeway frontage land that is going through a specific plan of its own. 

As I pointed out, the key differences are that the land owners are pushing for it and paying for it. I'm in favor of that type of specific plan, not what we passed last night, where we're paying for something that the landowners aren't even aware of yet.

Where is the funding coming from?

Currently, the city has amassed more than $4M from Cannabis retailers, and it was highly touted that "no general fund money will be going to this specific plan study."

Frequently, projects get funded by grants, and the city will mention how the money isn't coming from the General Fund, sometimes euphemistically called OPM (Other People's Money).

But I reminded those in the chamber that the cannabis money is Wildomar money —money that could be spent on something far more tangible than a study destined to win a meaningless award, gather dust on a shelf, and leave the undeveloped areas unchanged long past their consume-by dates.

I guess I'm a tad more pessimistic than my colleagues.

I suggest watching the video if this is of interest to you. Who knows, since the vote went 4-1 with me the only naysayer, it could be me who is completely out of touch with the community's needs. 

Here is a link to the entire city council meeting YouTube video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5kujmqACvo