Monday, December 30, 2019

• Low Income Housing Proposed For Wildomar Neighborhood

As much as I usually love to get all wordy, it's not happening on this topic. Just the facts. 


Before I get into the specifics (which there are very few at this point in time) the state mandates certain numbers of housing units for low income families (Regional Housing Needs Assessment) commonly referred to as RHNA [pronounced Reena].  

This came out in a public notice portion of Press Enterprise. To see the full notice, which is not keyword searchable, and with a small font to boot, follow this link. In the meantime, here is the salient part of the notice. 

Below is an excerpt from a Supervisor Jeffries newsletter dealing with the local RHNA numbers.
From Supervisor Jeffries' November 2019 Newsletter



More Homes?  

Through a very convoluted, state-required process, layers of largely unaccountable government bureaucracies evaluate and then mandate how many new home sites must be made available through local land use and zoning laws. 

The good folks who decide the “Regional Housing Needs Assessment” for Riverside County have tentatively concluded that we MUST add 235,000 more homes across our county.  

46,000 of those homes are proposed for our unincorporated (non-city) communities. It does not matter that our unincorporated (mostly rural communities) lack the needed infrastructure to support this level of new homes. 

Just to compare, last year San Bernardino County, which has a similar population to our county was only required to add 39 homes - YES 39!  

Other targets for new housing units in the 1st District are 192 for Canyon Lake, 12,217 for Lake Elsinore, 20,126 for City of Riverside, and 4,963 for Wildomar.
This link takes you to the 5th cycle RHNA allocation plan
It's tables of numbers for various areas. If you go there, be ready to keyword search: Wildomar, and have your magnifying glass handy.
This link takes you to a page that explains RHNA

Course of Action

If this issue concerns you, you have a few options at this juncture. 

• Email your opinions to the Clerk of the Board COB@RIVCO.ORG  Be sure to include Palm Communities for the development of affordable housing at the top of the email, and the date of the meeting before January 7th. Please CC me on such emails.

• You can attend the meeting in downtown Riverside and give a public comment. I believe people are alloted 3 minutes apiece.

• Further information concerning this matter may also be obtained by contacting Juan Garcia, Principal Development Specialist at 951-343-5473. 
This is as far as I'm going to go in this blog. No opinions about this project. I'm here to get the word out about the hearing on January 7th, 9:30am in downtown Riverside. 

If you know me, or this blog, you know that I'd love to go on and on, but I simply can't as a member of the city council. If there is any news on this, I'll be sure to get it out to you.

If you have questions or concerns, you can email them to me at jmorabito@cityofwildomar.org


•                •                •

No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.
– Albert Einstein

Wildomar Rap is too preoccupied to be clever at the moment. You'll have to take a raincheck.

This blog was produced for viewing on a desktop or a laptop. Though it's been optimized for smartphones, the formatting can look odd on a smartphone or if you get this delivered through email (such as missing video links). Link to proper format.

8 comments:

  1. If the state is mandating this, they should have to allow more money for our roads that are already falling apart! This will add another 10,000 cars to our overcrowded streets. We will need more money for schools and police protection. That is a large population to add to Wildomar. I am so against this no matter what income it covers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You point about the roads is reasonable. Unfortunately, there is very little reason or logic when it comes to things Sacramento demands.

      Delete
    2. Math seems off on this. How are you getting 10k cars?

      Delete
    3. Chris,
      I saw the same number and figured that they were taking the RHNA numbers (close to 5000 units over time) and adding 2 cars per unit. There has been no plans put forward for this item, but if one were to add 2 cars per unit, it would be a bit over 500.

      Delete
  2. My thoughts are that if we are on restricted water and are being pressed to go on solar, all new construction has to be solar in California, why are do we have sanctuary cities and open borders here. This is not racist, only practible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sorry, last word should be practical.

      Delete
    2. I wrote a long reply lamenting and explaining how messed up this whole idea is but it just got erased. All I can say is this is wrong and we need to vote these people out of office before they destroy our state and country!

      Delete
  3. I am way late on this and am very upset. It is ridiculous to think that we can lower the extremely high housing prices by building zillions of housing projects in a generally rural and peaceful land. Prices in California are high because of high taxes, high demand for our climate and topography and high prices of surrounding homes. The last think I want to is to lose our rustic beauty to miles and miles of track homes and buildings. This not only disturbs my visual and emotional peace, it ruins our natural landscape and wildlife that will be extinct if we do not stop building! With open borders, free school, housing and benefits to non citizens and sanctuary for criminals, how can we lower demand and housing prices? We simply cannot build enough to overcome the population demand upon our county!!! and city. This is a sham way to bring in voters that will keep the politicians in office up in Sacramento. Open borders, crowd out the rural residents, and give stipends so the new residents can afford the high cost! All for votes using our tax money! California has a supermajority Democrat ruled government and their goal is to make every area and city under their control. This new housing does not help the street people and wandering men that roam our streets either looking for drugs or perhaps needing mental help. These homes are for new families to move in and cause less help to come for those who need it the most. The real homeless who need far more help and cannot be simply stuck in an apartment. God help us!

    ReplyDelete

Let's hear what you have to say... for other inquiries try the email listed under "view my complete profile" but if you want to discuss a blog topic, I'll only do it in this comment section, not by email.